R. M. Huffman is a physician, author, and observer of culture.

At the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic, the US President’s Chief Medical Adviser Dr Anthony Fauci and US Surgeon General Dr Jerome Adams told us not to wear masks, until they instructed us to wear one everywhere we went.

The Covid vaccines were declared to be effective at preventing the spread of disease, until breakthrough cases around the globe proved that wasn’t so, and that effectiveness was downgraded to “against hospitalization and death.”

Both The Lancet and the New England Journal of Medicine, two of the most prestigious medical journals in the world, have issued embarrassing retractions to widely publicized papers eventually found to have too little validity to be published.

Anyone who suggested that the pandemic originated in a Wuhan laboratory and not a Chinese wet market was labeled a conspiracy theorist by official sources who later had to admit they were possibly correct. The same proved true for everyone who accused Fauci and the National Institutes of Health of funding gain-of-function research at the lab: they were crazy, until they were right.

The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists urged all pregnant women to be vaccinated, asserting that the new injections were completely safe. Now, a new review of that same data suggests that one in eight women spontaneously aborted her pregnancy after getting the jab.

Even medical terms – such as ‘herd immunity’, and the word ‘vaccine’ itself – have literally been redefined over the past few months.

All this has shocked a great number of informed, educated people around the world. Should it, though? In fact, a brief glance through the history of science demonstrates that scientists being completely and utterly wrong – in retrospect, often comically so – is the norm, not an aberration. It’s long past time for modern scientific researchers to discover a proper sense of humility and to step down from the pedestal of secular priesthood they’ve ascended.

Stories about an advisory panel’s recommendation to the Food and Drug Administration to approve a Moderna booster shot contained a quote that most might find truly incredible. “It’s more a gut feeling rather than based on really truly serious data,” said biochemistry professor Dr Patrick Moore. “The data itself is not strong, but it is certainly going in the direction that is supportive of this vote.”

How can a scientific advisory panel make such a recommendation while admitting it’s based on feeling, not fact? In fact, it happens all the time. ‘Medical consensus’ is a term that carries an authoritative denotation, yet it simply means that a bunch of experts got together and decided amongst themselves what’s correct.

The problem is that, today and in the past, those experts – in virtually every field – are so often wrong. 

Climate data has been gathered and climate modeling performed for almost a century now, and dire predictions have proceeded accordingly for 50 years. Famines would hit the United States in the 1970s; a new ice age would freeze the globe, while energy demand would boil rivers dry; the depletion of the ozone layer would lay waste to life on Earth. Perhaps the most dramatic was the promise in 1969 that “everybody will disappear in a cloud of blue steam in twenty years.” These doomsayers were highly trained scientists from major universities and national research centers, not street-corner cultists wearing cardboard signs. Nevertheless, the deadlines passed without apocalypse.

Joseph Priestley discovered oxygen in 1774 and nitrous oxide soon after, cementing his rightful place in the history of science. His great discovery was made in the course of his pursuit of phlogiston theory; in fact, he initially called oxygen “dephlogosticated air.” For about a century, from the 1660s to the 1770s, fire was thought by the scientific community to be the result of combustible materials emitting a substance or essence called phlogiston. Very few readers are likely to have heard of phlogiston theory, and even a schoolchild might chuckle at the idea, but Priestley would have vehemently argued for his position, delivering treatise after treatise defending the gospel of phlogistons.

A Greek physician (to gladiators Marcus Aurelius and his son Commodus, for those familiar with the film) named Galen developed a comprehensive understanding of human anatomy in the 2nd-century Roman Empire. His studies improved medical knowledge, certainly; for example, Galen showed that vessels carried blood, and not air, which overturned 400 years of physiological theory. His anatomical and physiological ideas were considered authoritative and went uncontested by students of medicine for 1,300 years. However, in the 1500s, Andreas Vesalius, a Flemish physician and anatomist, realized Galen had derived much of his ‘knowledge’ of human anatomy from apes and pigs. Abandoning Galen and redoing the work himself, this time on actual human cadavers, he wrote and illustrated the first modern anatomy textbook and erased Galen from medical training (though not history).

In fact, the list of superseded scientific and medical theories once broadly considered true and now seen as incomplete, inaccurate, or utterly fictional with no tether to reality whatsoever, is extraordinarily long. Naturally, modern researchers will argue that those past scientists were wrong, but we know better now, and scientists today are promoting and teaching accurate information. 

Are they?

Have the experts been right on Covid-19, or have they littered the past two years with unfulfilled predictions, bad advice, and misinformation? Are there any true ‘experts’ on a novel disease at all?

What else are we being told is ‘scientific fact’ that future generations will chuckle at while shaking their heads?

Anthropogenic climate change that will wreak untold havoc unless the jet-setting governments of the world can have more of your money and control over your lives?

Gender theory that relegates chromosomal and biological reality to an incidental genetic quirk that must be corrected by hormone therapy and surgery?

Uniformitarianism – Hutton’s and Lyell’s presupposition that Earth’s geologic features are a result of the same gradual processes seen today, and not singular catastrophes – which forms the bedrock foundation of modern geology?

The cursorial theory of bird evolution, at the moment dominant over arboreal theory, that leads to such eye-popping declarations as “the hummingbird is the smallest dinosaur”?

The popular understanding and perception of dinosaurs in general, largely created by artist renderings and pure paleontologist guesswork from fossilized partial skeletons? 

Darwinian evolution, dependent on trillions of mutations that both add de novo genetic information and impart a survival benefit, despite no such mutation, in any organism, ever being described?

In some circles, both academic and cultural, even questioning one of these ‘scientific facts’ will result in ostracism and derision. That’s always been the dominant attitude of any consensus of scientists, and one imagines it likely always will be. Considering the current and growing misgivings of the trustworthiness of scientific and medical authorities, perhaps two pieces of advice might be useful.

First, to the general public: science is a process of epistemology – that is, how things can be known – which is incredibly useful, but limited in scope. The scientific method depends on an experiment being repeatable and measurable. Hence, scientific inquiry is definitionally limited to the present and the material. Beware any ‘scientific expert’ making dispositive assertions about the past or the future and attempting to shout everyone else out of the room.

Second, to physicians, researchers, and the scientific and medical communities at large: approach your roles with some humility. Even children have immediate access to pocket computers, with libraries of information. Yes, that includes piles of misinformation that need to be corrected. That said, you do no one favors, yourselves most of all, when you overstep the bounds of experimental knowledge and adopt the roles of priests, prophets, and oracles. Your collective lack of humility, as we’ve seen over and over in the context of Covid-19, can result in real harm. 

For the public to regain its faith in science, scientists must cast off the arrogant authority that at this point is tattered and torn anyway.

Vaccine passports transform society into a dystopian NIGHTMARE,

forcing unvaxxed to live like FUGITIVES – NaturalNews.com

Vaccine passports transform society into a dystopian NIGHTMARE, forcing unvaxxed to live like FUGITIVES

Thursday, November 11, 2021 by: Mike Adams
Tags: banned, COVID Pass, depopulation, dystopian, enslaved, evil, food supply, genocide, Lithuania, obey, Orwellian, police state, segregation, starvation

Previous :Decarbonization TERRAFORMING of planet Earth is now under way… giant machines to be installed in Iowa to suck “life molecules” out of the atmosphere and cause global crops to FAIL

Thread by @gluboco on Thread Reader App – Thread Reader App

Gluboco Lietuva

Banishment
Increasing punishment: ever harder to get food,medicine,car fuel
Segregation
Undercover police raids
Hate
Media censorship,intimidation

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1456627584586944514.html

Here's the authoritarian future inevitably facing all countries which impose a Covid Pass regime:

1/

BANISHMENT:

Lithuania is Europe's strictest Covid Pass regime. It's week 8. There's no end planned. And it's getting stricter.

 

Gluboco Lietuva

 

5 Nov, 42 tweets, 13 min read

 

Lithuania's Covid Pass week 8

Banishment
Increasing punishment: ever harder to get food,medicine,car fuel
Segregation
Undercover police raids
Hate
Media censorship,intimidation

Here's the authoritarian future inevitably facing all countries which impose a Covid Pass regime:

1/

BANISHMENT:

Lithuania is Europe's strictest Covid Pass regime. It's week 8. There's no end planned. And it's getting stricter.

With no Pass, my wife and I may only enter small shops which mainly sell food, pharma, optics, or farm/pet goods.

We're banned everywhere else.

2/

Without a Pass, we are banned, by law, from every clothes store.

Fashion, sports, kids', punk, wedding dresses: all clothing stores ban us.

Even second-hand stores must enforce the banishment. No one may buy or sell without the Pass.

3/

 

Technology. Books. Health and beauty. Variety stores.

Without a Pass, we may not enter.

We are banished.

4/

INCREASING PUNISHMENT:

Until mid-Oct, the law allowed us to buy food and medicine in small shops.

Bureaucrats decided this was too lax. Two weeks ago they imposed a new restriction on small shops:

Either limit capacity to 1 shopper per 30m2

Or ban people without a Pass.

5/

One shopper per 30m2 is too few for many shops to survive.

The bureaucrats' rule forced shops to decide: save their own business, or ban us from the few remaining shops
permitted to us.

Many shops - chains and independent - chose the option to ban us.

Kill or be killed.

6/

The result: in many areas, there's no longer anywhere to buy food without a Pass.

Supermarkets already banned us since Sept. Now small shops also ban us.

So how to buy food?

Online. Outdoor markets. Or travel to one of the dwindling number of shops which don't *yet* ban us.
7/

 

Most pharmacies chose to not ban people with no Pass. Given their small size, this decision means only one client may be inside at a time.

The result: clients wait outside in the cold. Or leave without medicine.

At pharmacies which require the Pass, clients enter as usual.

8/

For gas (petrol) stations, the increasing coercion has resulted in a mixed system.

2 out of 5 stations decided to completely ban people with no Pass.

About 1 out of 5 still allow full access.

The rest ban us from entering inside, but permit us to fill up and pay outside.

9/

SEGREGATION:

In a few cases, the law doesn't banish us completely. Instead it allows us restricted service.

At banks, those with the Pass receive all services.

But for those without a Pass, the law only permits us "essential financial services" for a maximum of 15 minutes.
10/

 

At libraries, people with a Covid Pass may use all facilities.

But without a Pass, my family may not enter or use the facilities. We may only pick up a pre-ordered book.

Separate entrances enforce the segregation.

Separate and unequal: legalised segregation in Europe 2021.
11/

POLICE STATE:

Undercover plain-clothes police now raid supermarkets and shopping centers, stopping people to check their Covid Pass and ID to verify that it's a valid Pass belonging to that person.

The police give press conferences about the raids:

12/

The size of the police raids is staggering.

One day last week, 200 officers in plain clothes raided stores and malls. That's 2.5% of all officers in the nation.

They conducted surprise investigations on 11,700 people. That's 0.4% of the entire population.

In one day.

13/

Imagine:

You're in a supermarket, pushing your cart through an aisle. A person in normal clothes suddenly stops you and demands to see your Covid Pass and ID.

If anything is not in order, you're thrown out and face a fine of up to 5000 euros and jail of up to six years.

14/

 

"17-year old girl arrested for entering shopping mall!"

Every day, media publicise police reports of people who enter stores with a Pass belonging to someone else.

This is not "education to encourage vaccination".

This is a police state.

15/

HATE:

Us vs. them. Othering. Legalised segregation.

Opinion that was repugnant in 2019 has become mainstream in 2021.

Restriction by restriction, the Covid Pass regime has shredded the bonds which hold us all together in one society.

16/

CENSORSHIP, INTIMIDATION:

Revoking some freedoms has opened the door to revoke more.

Media and government collude to block free speech. Lithuanian media is among Europe's first in stifling dissent on Covid policy.

Many techniques have developed. Censorship the most direct:
17/

Another technique: stigmatise principled opposition.

I've written often how debate about the Pass is stigmatised. Incredibly to me, my own writing became another example of this: Lithuania's state media now attacks me for writing about the Covid Pass regime.

18/

LRT is Lithuania's BBC: government-funded, the biggest media group.

They published a long Lithuanian article attacking me, then a short English one.

The attacks on me are a good illustration of how media and government in every country avoid principled debate about the Pass
19/

One technique to stigmatise opposition to the Pass: cast doubt on reality.

For example, in my case, I wrote that my family cannot print documents because copy shops require a Covid Pass.

The state media tells its audience this is a lie: copy centers don't require the Pass.

20/

CopyPro is a well-known copy center chain in Lithuania.

There's a branch of CopyPro located 6 minutes from the headquarters of the state media company:

21/

This is the copy shop. Like all non-essential shops, it requires the Pass. No Pass, no entry.

Check it out yourself; the address is in the image.

The media says this does not exist.

This is doublethink: "Accept as false what is clearly true... because we tell you to!".

22/

Another technique to stigmatise opposition: smear them.

The headline of the article about me is "Twitter users donate money to Lithuanian 'victim'". It's also the article's URL.

And it's 100% false: no one has donated anything to me. I've never taken one cent from this.

23/

I've publicly written dozens of times that I will never take money or donations. My only goal: defend freedom against authoritarianism.

But the state media doesn't mention this at all.

Instead, they resort to the fraught trope of the greedy money-grubber.

For shame.

24/

Small, unreliable-looking sites! Anonymous circulation! Fake readers!

 

Who/What rules the world?

'...There is not defense against an evil which only the victims and the perpetrators know exists..'Christopher, a retired  English High Court Judge and 31st Degree Scottish Rite Freemason

As Gore Vidal once said:

"It doesn’t actually make any difference whether the President is Republican or Democrat. The genius of the American ruling class is that it has been able to make the people think that they have had something to do with the electing of presidents for 200 years when they’ve had absolutely nothing to say about the candidates or the policies or the way the country is run. A very small group controls just about everything".

Conspirators Hierarchy - The Committee of300  by Dr. John Coleman

The Hallett Report No5 on Illegitimacy Royal Family

"...I Love INLNews.com.......INLnews.com is easy to find but hard to leave...."..
             Historical Crime Solving  Non Fiction

http://inlnews.com/Freemasonry__History.html

Christine Martin Discusses the Builderberg Group

and Who Really Runs The World

Part One of Four

Christine Martin Discusses the Builderberg Group

and Who Really Runs The World

Part Two of Four

Christine Martin Discusses the Builderberg Group

and Who Really Runs The World

Part Three of Four

Christine Martin Discusses the Builderberg Group

and Who Really Runs The World

Part Four of Four

 Christopher  at 31st Degree Scottish Rite Freemason and former High Court Jude while being interviewed bt writer Matin Short added...' Masonic doctors can also be used..'

Christopher continue for about half an hour to list examples of the ways in which corrupt members of the Brotherhood could defeat opposition..'  ... those in power in Freemasons Hall knew something of what went on, but they felt defeated by it and preferred to look the other way rather than take steps to eradicate it...' ... Christopher said... if Christopher and his group failed for force the issue into the open, the organization would become so morally polluted that it would simply cease to exist...' Christopher also said ..we are not solely concerned with the Brotherhood .. it was the victims of those who used masonry as a source of personal power who has to be helped as well...

 

Christopher also said ..'..only the fighters have a hope of beating the system once it's at work against them' ..'Most people, fighters or not, are beaten in the end, though ,,It's..you see... you finish up not knowing who you can trust..you can get no help because your story sounds so paranoid that you are thought a crank, one of those nuts who think the whole world is a 'conspiracy' against 'them'. It is a strange phenomenon...Bt setting up a situation that most people will think of as fantasy, these people can poison every part of a person's life... if they give in they go under... if they don't give in... it is only putting off the day they go under...because if they fight, so much unhappiness will be brought to the people around them that there will likely come a time when even their own families and close friends turn against them out of desperation.... when that happens ..... and they are without friends where ever they look...they become easy meat... the newspaper will not touch them or their story...

'...There is not defense against an evil which only the victims and the perpetrators know exists..'

With vague innuendo and smears, the state media disparages any source other than itself, and belittles people - i.e., you, reading this message now - who want to know more about the Covid Pass regime.

25/

Hate speech! Censor! Criminalise! Prosecute! Punish!

This isn't a random internet troll; this is Lithuania's government-funded media attacking me for describing the Covid Pass regime.

This is intimidation.

26/

What the media doesn't address stands out even more.

In my posts, I discuss authoritarianism 25 times, segregation 14 times, freedom 10 times.

The media mention that: 0 times.

This is deflection to avoid debate and dismiss opposition.

And it's happening everywhere.

27/

Censor. Stigmatise. Doublethink. Smear. Intimidate. Deflect.
This is how leaders and media - here and around the world - try to normalise what is not normal: an authoritarian regime of segregation and control where undesired behaviour is punished with banishment from society.
28/

But we can now see with our own eyes the society which the Covid Pass has created.

So no more doublethink. No more deflection.

This is the headline that needs to be written:

"Lithuania banishes citizens from food,work,clothes, books, toys. Other countries following soon."

29/

The Covid Pass has already transformed Lithuania into a regime of authoritarianism and segregation.
But there's nothing unique about our case. We're just ahead by a few months.

Other countries are now starting to face the same inevitable reality.

New laws in Eastern Europe:
30/

In Western Europe, many countries started Covid Pass restrictions in the summer or early fall: France, Italy, Austria, Cyprus, Greece, Switzerland, Netherlands...

As the winter comes, the restrictions are expanding.

New rules imposed in just the last two weeks:

31/

New rules in the Asia-Pacific region in the last two weeks:

32/

In every country the intention behind the Covid Pass is noble: a healthy society.

But in their zeal, leaders and media dismiss what we can now see with our own eyes: the Pass is unleashing the segregation,hate, and authoritarianism we thought our world had overcome long ago.
33/

If your goal is to encourage vaccination, then encourage vaccination.

You don't need hate and othering.

You don't need to ban your neighbours from food, clothes, income.

You don't need to create an authoritarian society of legalised segregation.

34/

3 months ago, my wife and I were free citizens in a modern democracy.

Now, we're banned from food shops, big and small. Cannot buy clothes, toys, or books for our kids. Have no income. And leaders and media openly wish for our death.

35/

It’s astounding to me that this needs to be said, but here we are:

Banishment from society is wrong.
Authoritarianism is wrong.
Segregation is wrong.
Hate is wrong.

No amount of denial, dismissal, and doublethink can normalise it.

All of this is so deeply, deeply wrong.

36/

There is a lot of fear around us, and fear leads to anger.

But we shouldn't let that fear control us.

We shouldn't let that fear make us forget who we are as individuals.

37/

A mob may say that people without a Covid Pass should be banished from society.

A mob may wish for hate and death.

But as individuals, people would never accept this de- humanisation of their families, friends, and neighbours.

38/

My wife and I wrote this message because we hope to show people - as individuals - the reality of life in a Covid Pass regime.

We hope - and truly believe - that as individuals we will all recognise the inhumanity and reject the segregation and hatred that it creates.

/39

So we'd be deeply grateful for your help to share this message so that together, we can unite to stop this madness before it's too late.

end/

References:

I posted all references used in this writing at: txti.es/covid-pass-ref…

It includes links to: laws, official sources, quotes, news articles, company policies and information, statistics.

References - Covid PassReferences used in my writing about the Covid Pass. Includes links to: the law and official sources, quotes, news articles, company policies and information, statistics.http://txti.es/covid-pass-references/images

@mentionsunroll

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh 

 Keep Current with Gluboco Lietuva

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

 Read all threads

 This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

f!

ll"

With no Pass, my wife and I may only enter small shops which mainly sell food, pharma, optics, or farm/pet goods. We're banned everywhere else.

 https://greatgameindia.com/bill-gates-dtp-vaccine-africa/

The study (read below) titled, The Introduction of Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis and Oral Polio Vaccine Among Young Infants in an Urban African Community: A Natural Experiment was commissioned by the Danish government and Novo Nordisk Foundation and was conducted by a team of the world’s leading experts on African vaccination led by two most prominent names, Drs. Søren Wengel Mogensen and Peter Aaby.

The DTP vaccine is a class of combination vaccines against three infectious diseases in humans: diphtheria, pertussis (whooping cough), and tetanus.

The DTP vaccine was discontinued in the United States and other western nations in the 1990s following thousands of reports of death and brain damage. Despite widespread vaccination, the United States and other countries are still experiencing large pertussis outbreaks.

Until the study was published in 2017, the WHO (World Health Organisation) never conducted the kind of vaccinated/unvaccinated (or placebo) study necessary to ascertain if the DTP vaccine actually yields beneficial health outcomes.